Kearney CEO Study — 89% see AI as critical, but only 25% feel ready
A global Kearney study shows a gap between understanding the importance of AI and actual readiness for transformation. That is exactly the problem EANTRO addresses.
EANTRO case study — team alignment in a fintech AI transformation
A fintech company was implementing an AI system for credit decisions. Technology worked, but the risk team resisted. The EANSYNC protocol helped balance accountability.
McKinsey and Big 3 on why AI transformations fail — the human factor takes center stage
Research from McKinsey, BCG, and Bain shows — most AI project failures are linked not to technology but to the human factor.
EANTRO introduces Human Risk Index methodology — turning resistance into metrics
We publish a detailed description of our methodology for measuring human risks in AI transformations. Human Risk Index turns "gut feel" into objective data for decisions.
ICF on ethics of using AI in coaching — where the tool ends and risk begins
ICF publishes ethical principles for working with AI in coaching. The key question — how to uphold professional standards when AI tools become part of the process?
Case study — how EANTRO helped a major retailer avoid AI transformation failure
Adoption of an AI workforce management system stalled at scale. Human Risk Index uncovered hidden sabotage risks.
McKinsey and Gartner on the gap between AI adoption and management maturity
New research from Big 3 and Gartner shows — most companies are actively adopting AI, but less than a third have a strategy for managing human risks. That is our niche.
ICF Thought Leadership Institute — the future of coaching in the AI ecosystem
The center for research on the future of coaching publishes a report on how the profession is adapting. Key finding — the role of coaching is becoming even more critical.
ICF publishes new standards — coaching in the age of artificial intelligence
The International Coaching Federation has released updated standards that account for the role of AI in professional practice. How does this change the approach to the human factor in transformations?